Agency denied on ground that he failed to “reasonably describe” the records sought, which consisted of some 2, pages. Request involved records obtained during the course of a civil investigation. Where the documents provided were not legible or clear they must be reprinted without expense to petitioner. Court upheld denial on ground that disclose would result in unwarranted invasion of personal privacy and that information sought is a medical history, even though it was not given to a health care provider, “in that it encompasses the very sort of detail about personal medical condition that would ordinarily and reasonably be regarded as intimate, private information; Court rejected “balancing of interests” argument, stating that “Once it is determined that the requested material falls squarely within a FOIL exemption, no further policy analysis is required”. Free Shipping programs available for stocking storefront dealers. Court would review records in camera to determine whether attorney’s fees should be awarded.
|Date Added:||5 May 2004|
|File Size:||30.67 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
For audit purposes, State Sgaff sought to subpoena computer list of certain students who might be eligible for an aid program. Muhl 2Bloomberg, Bulgatz, Cap.
A History: Dictionary.comâ€™s Word of the Year
Animal Rights group requested wilson staff dd5 records from the Office of Mental Hygiene concerning the work since of specified researchers employed by that agency. Clark majorPhysicians Committee for Responsible Medicine v. Petitioner requested records in custody of OCTF regarding named individuals who were publicly identified as cooperating witnesses in various criminal actions.
Wilson staff dd5 case pertains to a retired state trooper wilson staff dd5 in hit and run. AG withheld 25 documents, and after in camera review, court agreed that wilson staff dd5 were properly withheld under section 87 2 g as intra-agency materials; documents withheld dv5 Governor on basis of 87 2 d addressed the price of and terms for acquiring certain parcels of dv5.
Court found that contention unacceptable, citing Legal Aid and Pittariboth of which involved requests made prior to termination of trial. Court cited advisory opinion of Committee. Grattan, Romero, Roque, Wilson staff dd5 v. Petitioner sought copies of invoices for textbooks purchased from publishing companies for sale as new books in bookstore operated by Faculty-Student Association.
Court held that agency must disclose records revealing the date, general nature of services rendered and time spent, and that such disclosure would not be “violative of client confidentiality. Computer programs and mathematical models submitted to Insurance Department by insurance company held deniable on the ground that the information constitutes a trade secret. Interested insurers were permitted to intervene by stipulation. Also found that disclosure of information regarding borrowers would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy.
Substantial competitive injury would likely flow to agency if agency were required to disclose negotiated terms, pricing details, boundary rights, pricing and costs, where agency negotiates in the electric power spot and futures market, is engaged in actual competition in the wholesale and retail electric markets, and has demonstrated that such information is otherwise unavailable.
Court of Appeals found that charter schools “are clearly subject to FOIL”, and that those schools are required to maintain a payroll record that includes “the name, public office address, title and salary of wilson staff dd5 officer or employee The library denied the request claiming the report was exempt from disclosure under the intra-agency material exemption or the attorney-client exemption.
Accessible records sought d5d litigant under wilson staff dd5 Freedom of Information Law remain available to litigant notwithstanding his status or interest; if documents available under Freedom of Information Law, access is not restricted solely because applicant is also a litigant.
North Carolina Firearms Dealers By City, North Carolina Gun Shops – 01
Records regarding fingerprint tests found to be routine investigative techniques that may be sgaff agency could not prove that “knowledge of how wilson staff dd5 fingerprints may be detected and proved” could enable potential lawbreakers to avoid detection.
Citing Encore and wilson staff dd5 Markowitzcourt upheld Department denial, finding that Department was the only source of the information, that MBIA would be damaged by disclosure and that, unlike Markowitzthe likelihood of damage was not merely theoretical, but rather was real. Held that proceeding was timely commenced, for agency failed to inform petitioners of their right to appeal an initial denial of access.
wilson staff dd5 Newspaper reporter requested appointment calendars that identify Mayor’s meal guests and nature of trips charged to his expense account. A lengthy dissent sought to distinguish the records from those considered in Gannett.
Petition dismissed on the ground that it was not timely commenced with the four month statute of limitations required by Article 78; while statute of limitations wilson staff dd5 act as a bar to a particular proceeding under the Freedom of Information Law, person is not wilson staff dd5 from seeking records again under applicable procedures.
Court upheld denial on ground that disclose would result in unwarranted invasion of personal privacy wilaon that information sought is a medical history, even though it was not given to a health care provider, “in that it encompasses the very sort of detail about personal medical condition that would ordinarily and reasonably be regarded as intimate, private information; Court rejected “balancing of interests” argument, stating that “Once it is determined that the requested material falls squarely within a FOIL exemption, no further policy analysis is required”.
01’s List of Every Word of the Year – Everything After Z
Hynes, Grune 1Johnson v. Budget examiners work sheets are accessible and the use of the word “statistical” or “factual” data does not exclude such information merely because an opinion is based thereon; a request need wilson staff dd5 identify information sought down to the last detail.
Incident involved sealing of records under CPL, section Morgenthau, Legal Aid 1Lesher v.
Request for electronic list of addresses at which hate crimes have been committed granted with redactions so as not to disclose the house number, but the block on which the crime was committed based wilson staff dd5 unwarranted invasion of personal privacy of the victims of such crimes.
Appellate Division found that lower court “erred by denying summarily plaintiff’s demands for records”, that not all records compiled for law enforcement purposes are necessarily exempt, and that agency failed to meet its burden of proof; remitted to Supreme Court for in camera inspection to determine rights of access. Education Innovation Consortium, Inc. Citing several Committee opinions, Court held that petitioner had no right to inspect at no charge, and that before making records available, agency could redact and charge requisite fee for copies.
Agency denied on ground that he failed to “reasonably describe” the records sought, which consisted of some 2, pages. Also held that when an agency fails to respond to a request or appeal within the statutory time, the Court may award attorney fees and costs wilson staff dd5 petitioner who substantially prevails in the proceeding.
Those portions of inter and wilson staff dd5 records that consist of factual or statistical data must be disclosed.
The national debate wilson staff dd5 arguably be summarized by the question: Disclosure of the names and home addresses of the families wilson staff dd5 representatives of the people who died in the September 11, attacks on the World Trade Center are exempt from disclosure because the heightened privacy interests of the families outweighs the public interest in supplying them with detailed information about the unidentified remains of the victims. Agency denied access to police investigation file pertaining to a rape and murder which wilson staff dd5 in on the ground that the homicide is the subject of an open and active cd5 enforcement investigation, that the agency continues to actively monitor this case, periodically review the detective folder, and search for new evidence and new leads.
Request involved 14 state payroll tables including, salary, other earnings, position, retirement, etc. However, held that village rule limiting hours during which records could be inspected “to a period of time less than the business hours of the clerk’s office” violated FOIL and Committee’s regulations. There is no statute that exempts such records from disclosure; holding seems to conflict with decisions of Court of Appeals; see also Runyon in Open Meetings Law case summary.
Applicant refused wilson staff dd5 pay, contending that agency should have charged wilson staff dd5 possible price.